Skip to main content

Is who.int a Scam? Security Check Results - World Health Organization

who.int Security Report Summary

who.int received a security score of 73 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers World Health Organization's website security posture. World Health Organization operates in the Healthcare industry in N/a.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a globally recognized United Nations agency dedicated to promoting health, ensuring safety, and serving vulnerable populations worldwide. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for health topics, emergencies, data, and organizational information, targeting a general global audience. WHO holds a strong market position as a leading international health authority with an enterprise-level digital presence. The site is well-branded, consistent, and professionally maintained, reflecting WHO's authoritative status. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including ASP.NET, Kendo UI, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity with consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, hosted likely on WHO or UN infrastructure with CDN support. Performance is moderate with good technical implementation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses consent mechanisms for tracking, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, vulnerability disclosure, and privacy documentation are not found, indicating room for improvement in compliance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. Overall, the WHO website is a trustworthy, professional, and authoritative resource with excellent content quality and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit privacy and cookie policies, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance compliance and user trust.

The security scan identified 25 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Kendo UI, Fundraise Up widget, Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX (ScriptResource.axd), Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

who.int favicon

Is who.int Safe? Security Analysis for World Health Organization

https://who.int

Check if who.int is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/aenterprise
Google FontsFontAwesomeKendo UIFundraise Up widgetMicrosoft ASP.NET AJAX (ScriptResource.axd)+3 more
Analyzed 10/16/2025Completed 11:02:26 AM6mo ago
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Healthcare avg (65)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for who.int

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainwho.int
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a globally recognized United Nations agency dedicated to promoting health, ensuring safety, and serving vulnerable populations worldwide. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for health topics, emergencies, data, and organizational information, targeting a general global audience. WHO holds a strong market position as a leading international health authority with an enterprise-level digital presence. The site is well-branded, consistent, and professionally maintained, reflecting WHO's authoritative status. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including ASP.NET, Kendo UI, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity with consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, hosted likely on WHO or UN infrastructure with CDN support. Performance is moderate with good technical implementation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses consent mechanisms for tracking, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, vulnerability disclosure, and privacy documentation are not found, indicating room for improvement in compliance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. Overall, the WHO website is a trustworthy, professional, and authoritative resource with excellent content quality and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit privacy and cookie policies, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance compliance and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsFontAwesomeKendo UIFundraise Up widgetMicrosoft ASP.NET AJAX (ScriptResource.axd)Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager

6 urgent findings need attention

6 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep who.int under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for who.int.

Security Headers

3 findings

80/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

5 findings

55/100

Email Security

3 findings

85/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

WHO operates as a non-profit international organization in the healthcare and government sectors, providing global health leadership, policy advocacy, and emergency response coordination. Its business model is centered on public service and international cooperation rather than commercial revenue. The organization targets a broad global audience including governments, health professionals, and the public. WHO's market position is unmatched in global health governance, supported by extensive partnerships and regional offices. The website reflects this with links to regional WHO sites and partner organizations. Growth indicators include ongoing initiatives and data-driven health monitoring. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving regional WHO offices and UN agencies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The WHO website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, consent-based tracking, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity is managed with user consent, indicating privacy awareness. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may hinder rapid incident handling. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting potential for enhancement. No vulnerable libraries or critical security issues were identified. Overall, the site is secure but could improve compliance and user assurance by publishing comprehensive security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy accessible from the website footer.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

World Health Organization

Description:

The United Nations agency working to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable.

Key Services:
Health promotionHealth emergencies managementHealth data and policy advocacyGlobal health coordination
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsFontAwesomeKendo UIFundraise Up widgetMicrosoft ASP.NET AJAX (ScriptResource.axd)Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
ASP.NET
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Clarity with consent management

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityMonsido Heatmaps
Marketing Tools:
Fundraise Up
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and maintained by a reputable international organization.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the who.int security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete who.int security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:158.232.12.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spfincludes.who.int -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:422b6d07@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:192.133.11.1
Name Servers:
ext-dns-2.cern.chDNS only
ns1.wpro.who.intDNS only
whqdns1.who.intDNS only
whqdns2.who.intDNS only
whqdns3.who.intDNS only
MX Records:
10: who-int.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:158.232.12.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spfincludes.who.int -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does who.int compare?

See how who.int stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET framework with Sitefinity CMS indications, leveraging modern UI libraries like Kendo UI and FontAwesome for rich user experience. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy norms. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears stable with CDN usage for performance. Some technical debt may exist due to legacy ScriptResource.axd usage, but overall the infrastructure is robust. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance privacy documentation.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the who.int report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainwho.int
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the who.int report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about who.int

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website