Is wikimedia.org.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Wikimedia UK
https://wikimedia.org.ukCheck if wikimedia.org.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for wikimedia.org.uk
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
Wikimedia UK is a well-established UK charity founded in 2005, dedicated to promoting open access to knowledge and supporting the Wikimedia movement. The organization operates primarily in the non-profit sector, focusing on education, cultural partnerships, community engagement, and advocacy for open knowledge. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting a broad audience including volunteers, educational institutions, and the general public interested in free knowledge. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tools such as Yoast SEO and Smart Slider 3, hosted by Fasthosts Internet Ltd. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, including email, phone, and physical address, enhancing business credibility. No critical security issues or content safety concerns were detected, and the domain registration is consistent with the organization's profile, indicating high legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Detected Technologies
9 urgent findings need attention
9 high
- + 1 more findings in the full report below
Keep wikimedia.org.uk under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
8 findings
15/100
GDPR Compliance
3 findings
68/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
4 findings
75/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Wikimedia UK holds a strong market position as the UK charity supporting Wikimedia projects and open knowledge initiatives. Their business model is non-profit, relying on donations, memberships, and partnerships with cultural and educational institutions. The organization benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem and demonstrates growth through community engagement and educational programs. Their digital presence supports their mission with clear calls to action for donations and membership. The website's content and structure support their advocacy and outreach efforts effectively, positioning them as a credible and authoritative entity in the open knowledge space.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
Wikimedia UK
6741827
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with user consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and a security.txt file indicates areas for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen security transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid for a non-profit organization, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Wikimedia UK
Wikimedia UK is the UK charity for the global Wikimedia movement, promoting open access to knowledge as a fundamental right and driver for social and economic development.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent mechanism
- Privacy policy and trust & safety page
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the wikimedia.org.uk security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete wikimedia.org.uk security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does wikimedia.org.uk compare?
See how wikimedia.org.uk stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the wikimedia.org.uk report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Scan your own website
Liked the wikimedia.org.uk report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about wikimedia.org.uk
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published