Skip to main content

Is zirk.us a Scam? Security Check Results - zirk.us

zirk.us Security Report Summary

zirk.us received a security score of 65 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers zirk.us's website security posture. zirk.us operates in the Technology industry in Germany.

zirk.us operates as an independent Mastodon social network server focused on the arts and humanities community, providing a platform for readers, writers, and academics to engage in cultural and intellectual discussions. The website leverages the Mastodon open-source platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as React and JavaScript ES modules to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. The domain is well-established, registered since 2004, and managed via GoDaddy with protective domain status flags, enhancing trustworthiness. However, the domain predates the Mastodon platform, indicating repurposing of the domain for this service. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves a niche community with good content quality and technical implementation.

The security scan identified 28 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Mastodon 4.4.7, React, JavaScript ES Modules, CSS, HTML5.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

zirk.us favicon

Is zirk.us Safe? Security Analysis for zirk.us

https://zirk.us

Check if zirk.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
Mastodon 4.4.7ReactJavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5
Analyzed 10/21/2025Completed 7:39:52 AM5mo ago
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Technology avg (72)

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for zirk.us

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainzirk.us
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

zirk.us operates as an independent Mastodon social network server focused on the arts and humanities community, providing a platform for readers, writers, and academics to engage in cultural and intellectual discussions. The website leverages the Mastodon open-source platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as React and JavaScript ES modules to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. The domain is well-established, registered since 2004, and managed via GoDaddy with protective domain status flags, enhancing trustworthiness. However, the domain predates the Mastodon platform, indicating repurposing of the domain for this service. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves a niche community with good content quality and technical implementation.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.4.7ReactJavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep zirk.us under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for zirk.us.

Security Headers

4 findings

75/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

58/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model centers on providing a community-driven social networking service within the fediverse, targeting arts and humanities enthusiasts globally. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its niche focus and use of Mastodon's decentralized architecture, appealing to users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely rely on community support or donations typical for Mastodon instances. The server has a modest active user base (~627 monthly active users), indicating a small but engaged community. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident. The platform's open-source foundation and transparent administration by a named individual contribute to its credibility and community trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective status flags preventing unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The platform would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and formalizing security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

zirk.us

Description:

Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Key Services:
Mastodon social networkingContent sharing and discussion platform
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.4.7ReactJavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Mastodon
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientUpdateProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon social network instance focused on arts and humanities.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the zirk.us security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete zirk.us security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:cst.fenwick@gmail.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(36 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:178.33.220.142
Name Servers:
ns33.domaincontrol.com
ns34.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023092301, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:33ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does zirk.us compare?

See how zirk.us stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Mastodon platform version 4.4.7, utilizing React and modern JavaScript modules for frontend rendering. The site loads multiple JavaScript and CSS assets with integrity checks, indicating attention to resource security. Hosting appears to be independent or VPS-based with domain registration via GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS detected, consistent with Mastodon's architecture. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the zirk.us report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainzirk.us
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the zirk.us report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about zirk.us

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website