Is zoo.org Safe? Security Analysis for Woodland Park Zoo
https://zoo.orgCheck if zoo.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for zoo.org
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
Woodland Park Zoo is a non-profit organization dedicated to wildlife conservation, education, and providing engaging visitor experiences in Seattle, Washington. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence focused on these core missions. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and third-party marketing and analytics tools, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and TikTok Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are not evident in the provided content, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed responses, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.
Detected Technologies
8 urgent findings need attention
8 high
Keep zoo.org under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
4 findings
70/100
GDPR Compliance
4 findings
53/100
NIS2 Compliance
9 findings
2/100
Email Security
4 findings
80/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Woodland Park Zoo operates as a medium-sized non-profit entity in the wildlife conservation sector, targeting families and general audiences interested in wildlife and education. The business model centers on visitor engagement, education programs, and conservation initiatives. The website's use of multiple tracking and marketing pixels suggests active digital marketing efforts. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy policies may impact trust for privacy-conscious users. The zoo appears well-positioned regionally with a consistent brand and good content quality, but could improve transparency and compliance to strengthen market trust.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of tracking scripts to minimize performance impact. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal policies, and transparency mechanisms.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Woodland Park Zoo
When you visit Woodland Park Zoo, you’ll make your day and a difference. Together, we are all for wildlife.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the zoo.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete zoo.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does zoo.org compare?
See how zoo.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the zoo.org report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Scan your own website
Liked the zoo.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about zoo.org
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published