Skip to main content

Is rpo.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rīgas pasažieru osta

rpo.lv Security Report Summary

rpo.lv received a security score of 55 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Rīgas pasažieru osta's website security posture. Rīgas pasažieru osta operates in the Transportation industry in Latvia.

Rīgas pasažieru osta operates as a key passenger port in Riga, Latvia, servicing approximately one million visitors annually arriving via cruise ships, ferries, and yachts. The organization also pursues real estate development and offers leisure opportunities near Riga's historic and active city center. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, supporting Latvian and English languages. Technically, the site uses jQuery and Slick Slider libraries, with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible in the provided HTML content, which limits direct communication channels. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

The security scan identified 32 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery, Slick Slider.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

rpo.lv favicon

Is rpo.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas pasažieru osta

https://rpo.lv

Check if rpo.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviamedium
jQuerySlick Slider
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 2:14:07 AM7mo ago
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for rpo.lv

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainrpo.lv
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

Rīgas pasažieru osta operates as a key passenger port in Riga, Latvia, servicing approximately one million visitors annually arriving via cruise ships, ferries, and yachts. The organization also pursues real estate development and offers leisure opportunities near Riga's historic and active city center. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, supporting Latvian and English languages. Technically, the site uses jQuery and Slick Slider libraries, with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible in the provided HTML content, which limits direct communication channels. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

jQuerySlick Slider

14 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 13 high

  • + 6 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep rpo.lv under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for rpo.lv.

Security Headers

5 findings

50/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

25/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as an essential transportation hub and real estate developer in Riga, targeting tourists, business clients, and investors. Its business model combines port operations with property development and leisure services, aiming to enhance the visitor experience and attract investments. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a focus on local and international audiences. Absence of detailed business registration or certification information on the site suggests potential areas for transparency enhancement. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are linked from the site.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from injection attacks, but also indicating limited interactive functionality. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is a significant compliance gap. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rīgas pasažieru osta

Description:

Rīgas pasažieru osta is a passenger port in Riga servicing approximately 1 million guests annually arriving by cruise ships, ferries, yachts, and other vessels excluding cargo ships. It also undertakes significant real estate development plans and offers leisure opportunities near Riga's old town and active city center.

Key Services:
Passenger port servicesReal estate developmentLeisure and tourism facilitation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySlick Slider
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the rpo.lv security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete rpo.lv security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:87.110.190.130 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 24 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:116.202.111.243
Name Servers:
ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns3.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: rpo-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:130ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:87.110.190.130 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does rpo.lv compare?

See how rpo.lv stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end approach with jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive sliders and responsive design. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages. However, no CMS or backend technology is identifiable from the HTML. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Performance appears moderate based on slider usage and image sizes. The site lacks advanced SEO features such as structured data markup and meta descriptions. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks beyond standard HTML5 elements. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the rpo.lv report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainrpo.lv
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the rpo.lv report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about rpo.lv

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website