Is watt.lv Safe? Security Analysis for WATT
http://www.watt.lvCheck if watt.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
10,000+
Domains scanned
500+
Security teams trust us
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Get the professional PDF report for watt.lv
Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
AI Summary
WATT is a Latvian-based small business specializing in lighting solutions retail, operating an e-commerce website built on WordPress with WooCommerce. The website targets local customers interested in lighting products and solutions, presenting a professional and consistent brand image. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and use of CAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust assessment, but the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.
Detected Technologies
15 urgent findings need attention
1 critical · 14 high
- + 7 more findings in the full report below
Keep watt.lv under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
8 findings
15/100
GDPR Compliance
5 findings
10/100
NIS2 Compliance
8 findings
17/100
Email Security
5 findings
65/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
WATT operates in the energy sector focusing on lighting solutions, serving a local Latvian market. The business model is retail-oriented with a showroom and online sales. The company appears to have been founded around 2018, aligning with the website's published date. The website leverages common e-commerce and marketing tools to engage customers and track performance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. The company targets general consumers and businesses needing lighting products. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not directly visible but the use of advanced marketing tools suggests an intent to scale. The lack of visible contact information and certifications may limit customer trust and business credibility.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit privacy policy and incident response information indicates potential compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. The site uses third-party tracking and advertising services, which require clear privacy disclosures to maintain compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, enhancing privacy documentation, and providing clear incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
WATT
WATT Gaismas risinājumu salons - Ideja top par gaismu!
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Use of reCAPTCHA
- Google Tag Manager integration
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce site focused on lighting solutions.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the watt.lv security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs, Google Ads
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete watt.lv security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
Weak DKIM Key
HIGHDKIM selector 'google' uses 272-bit key
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 52 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
How does watt.lv compare?
watt.lv scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the watt.lv report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
PDF Report & Export
PDF download, email delivery, unlock code
Marketing Intelligence
Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads
Plan Comparison
| Feature | PDF Report | Marketing+ |
|---|---|---|
| Full security analysis | ||
| Professional PDF export | ||
| Email delivery | ||
| Lifetime access + unlock code | ||
| Contact emails & phones | — | |
| Marketing outreach data | — |
Already purchased?
Order summary
Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.
Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.
SEQ SIA
Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050
Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806
Support: guard@offseq.com • +371 2256 5353
Want OffSeq to fix this?
Book a 30-minute remediation call
Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.
OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services
Scan your own website
Liked the watt.lv report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about watt.lv
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published