Skip to main content

Is architecture.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Royal Institute of British Architects

architecture.com Security Report Summary

architecture.com received a security score of 73 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers Royal Institute of British Architects's website security posture. Royal Institute of British Architects operates in the Other industry in United Kingdom.

The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) is a leading professional body and membership organization dedicated to advancing architecture. The website serves architects, students, and related professionals by providing education, resources, awards, and advocacy. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and offers comprehensive content relevant to its audience. Technically, it uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Umbraco CMS, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools with proper cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations.

The security scan identified 25 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Umbraco CMS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and AI-powered business intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

architecture.com favicon

Is architecture.com Safe? Security Analysis for Royal Institute of British Architects

https://architecture.com

Check if architecture.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomlarge
JavaScriptAlpine.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarMicrosoft Clarity+2 more
Analyzed 10/24/2025Completed 1:19:10 PM6mo ago
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

10,000+

Domains scanned

500+

Security teams trust us

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Get the professional PDF report for architecture.com

Export this security analysis as a professional PDF document, receive it via email, and access marketing intelligence data including contact emails and phone numbers. One-time purchase for lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainarchitecture.com
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

AI Summary

The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) is a leading professional body and membership organization dedicated to advancing architecture. The website serves architects, students, and related professionals by providing education, resources, awards, and advocacy. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and offers comprehensive content relevant to its audience. Technically, it uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Umbraco CMS, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools with proper cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptAlpine.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarMicrosoft ClarityCookiebotUmbraco CMS

6 urgent findings need attention

6 high

Continuous monitoring

Keep architecture.com under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for architecture.com.

Security Headers

3 findings

80/100

GDPR Compliance

2 findings

83/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

75/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

RIBA holds a strong market position as the UK's premier architectural institution with international influence. Its business model revolves around membership services, professional learning, publications, and events. The organization leverages partnerships with related domains such as RIBA Journal, RIBA Books, and RIBA Academy to extend its offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with consistent branding and high-quality content, targeting professional architects and related stakeholders. Growth indicators include active campaigns, awards, and educational webinars. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting the organization's mission and market reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling including anti-forgery tokens. However, the absence of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response information indicate areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts requires ongoing vigilance to prevent vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The organization would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Royal Institute of British Architects

Description:

RIBA advances architecture for all by building the world’s greatest community of architects through education, support, inspiration, and championing architects to deliver better, safer, more inclusive and sustainable places.

Key Services:
Professional learning and CPDArchitectural awards and competitionsPublications and resourcesAdvocacy and campaignsMembership services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptAlpine.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarMicrosoft ClarityCookiebotUmbraco CMS
Frameworks:
Alpine.js
Platforms:
Umbraco CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with anti-forgery tokens

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityHotjarGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityHotjarGoogle Analytics (via GTM)LinkedIn Insight TagFacebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the architecture.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete architecture.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.riba.org include:spf2.riba.org include:spf3.riba.org include:authsmtp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@riba.org
Forensic Reports:dmarc@riba.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.riba.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:1/1/2026 (68 days)
SANs:www.riba.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(expired)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.11.81, 172.67.70.223, 104.26.10.81
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:b51, 2606:4700:20::ac43:46df, 2606:4700:20::681a:a51
Name Servers:
george.ns.cloudflare.com
mira.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2385896934, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:47ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.riba.org include:spf2.riba.org include:spf3.riba.org include:authsmtp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does architecture.com compare?

See how architecture.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Umbraco CMS with a modern frontend using Alpine.js and various JavaScript libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is current and supports a professional user experience. No critical technical debt or risks were identified from the HTML content analysis.
Professional PDF & Marketing Data

Download the architecture.com report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

PDF Report & Export

PDF download, email delivery, unlock code

39.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Marketing Intelligence

Contact emails, phone numbers & warm leads

49.90 €one-time • Incl. 21% VAT

Plan Comparison

FeaturePDF ReportMarketing+
Full security analysis
Professional PDF export
Email delivery
Lifetime access + unlock code
Contact emails & phones
Marketing outreach data

Already purchased?

Order summary

Domainarchitecture.com
Access tierFull report or marketing add-on

Digital reports are delivered immediately after payment. By continuing you acknowledge the withdrawal waiver described in our Returns & Refunds policy.

VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Pay

Secure payments processed via EveryPay. Prices in EUR; Incl. 21% VAT.

SEQ SIA

Lastadijas 12 k-3, Riga, Latvia, LV-1050

Reg. No. 40203410806 • VAT LV40203410806

Support: guard@offseq.com+371 2256 5353

Scan your own website

Liked the architecture.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about architecture.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website